When designing interfaces, we are actually designing a trilogy, three parallel lines: the physical, emotional, and intellectual experience of a person.
What did they feel—how did they experience, laugh, smile, get upset on their route from point A to point B? What knowledge entered their head during the movement? What did they learn, what did they remember? What gestures did they make, how did they move, where did they linger?
A person can go right, left, slowly or quickly—it doesn't matter. But ultimately, all of this collapses into a unique "cardiogram"—the pattern of personal experience.
Throughout the entire length of the exhibition—both for the assimilation of information, for maintaining attention, and for creating a deep experience—it is important to alternate rhythms and intonations. It is important to avoid monotony.
The emotional journey can be compared to a cardiogram. It can be represented as a rhythmic pattern or even a score. The alternation of pauses, strong emotional episodes, moments of contemplation, and dramatically charged scenes are strung together and form the fabric of the viewer's emotional experience.
This is the sequence of all the viewer's movements and gestures in the space. The physical route is constructed using environmental and informational media. Architectural forms, exhibition equipment, and lighting set the viewer's trajectory of movement. A significant parameter here is also speed: in which zones and for how long the viewer lingers, how the pace of their movement changes. All of this is regulated by environmental solutions and directly affects the other two levels of the user journey.
Imagine a text document that contains all the content of the exhibition. All informational elements without exception: curatorial texts, object descriptions, labels, video subtitles, photo captions, and so on. Let’s try to highlight the main meanings in this text, to mark the levels of information—historical references, personal diaries, chronologies. What do we want to leave in the viewer’s memory after they leave the exhibition? How data is structured in perception and memory, which of it turns into knowledge and is retained after contact with the exhibition ends—this is the intellectual journey.
The viewer’s experience is manifested both in the environment and in material and non-material objects, in the architecture, in the smell. Each person has an individual route. One could even assume that no two are identical, if you look at them with full attention. This is the sequence of all physical and psycho-emotional states in the exhibition—at every moment in time.